On January 7, 2013, President Obama announced his nomination of Republican former senator of Nebraska Chuck Hagel to replace outgoing Leon Panetta as Secretary of Defense.
The Secretary of Defense is second (only to the President) in the
military chain of command and directly oversees the Department of
Defense and the nation’s armed forces. This makes the selection of this
cabinet-level position of the utmost importance concerning national
security, thus requiring a scrupulous vetting of the nominee.
A careful examination of Chuck Hagel and his record in the Senate
reveals that he is more than just unfit for the position but is also
likely to severely debilitate or compromise United States national
security.
As a member of the Senate, Hagel voted in the following manner on Defense issues:
- NAY on separate barracks for males and females in basic training
- YES to kill an amendment that called for sanctions on commercial fronts of the Communist Chinese military
- YES in support of China’s membership in the World Trade Organization
- YES on the Strategic Offensive Reductions Treaty to reduce U.S. nuclear stockpiles in parity with Russia
On May 14, 1998, Sen. Hagel voted to table (kill) the Hutchinson
Amendment (S.Amdt.2387) to the National Defense Authorization Act of
1999. This amendment would have required the President of the United
States to “compile a list of persons who are Communist Chinese military
companies and who are operative directly or indirectly in the United
States or any of its territories and possessions,” and to “publish the
list of such persons in the Federal Register.”
The
amendment would have also given the President the authority to invoke
sanctions against front corporations of China’s People’s Liberation
Army, which is the military arm of Communist Party of China. Although
the amendment and bill passed the Senate, it was subsequently referred
to the House Committee on National Security, where no action was taken
on it, and thus it failed to pass Congress.
In addition to his voting record above, in 2000 Senator Hagel endorsed
President Bill Clinton’s decision to “not deploy a limited national
missile defense system.” Hagel explained that missile defense “must move
forward on four parallel tracks – technology, Congress, our allies, and
the Russians.”
While Hagel believes that a U.S. missile defense system should only be
deployed with the cooperation of Russia, he does not consider such
cooperation from Russia as important when it comes to reducing nuclear
weapons. He has called for “sharply reducing the number of U.S. nuclear
weapons, possibly without equivalent cuts by Russia,” according to the Associated Press.
Hagel is also an advocate of the complete elimination of all nuclear
weapons from the face the planet and has worked with Global Zero, an
organization dedicated to the same goal. If confirmed, Hagel would be
the first incoming Secretary of Defense to be on record calling for the
reduction and eventual abolition of the U.S. nuclear stockpile.
Hagel’s soft stance on Communist China and Russia and advocacy for total nuclear disarmament has earned him recent words of praise from the Communist Party USA (CPUSA). The CPUSA’s official newspaper People’s World
described Hagel as one who does “represent the more sober elements who
have called in our national discourse for rejection of the old cold war
tactics, the unilateralism and the continual push for wars all over the
world.”
Joe Wendlend, the editor of the CPUSA’s theoretical journal Political Affairs, described Hagel as a “real Republican maverick,” in an article published on June 2, 2008. Past issues of Political Affairs
have touted Hagel, along with some Democratic senators, for opposing
the Iraq War and supporting immigration reform, or amnesty.
Phyllis Bennis, of the Washington D.C. based Institute for Policy Studies, wrote an article for The Nation magazine, published online on January 8, 2013, entitled “Will Chuck Hagel’s Appointment Actually Help the Anti-War Left?”
While acknowledging Hagel as a “conservative Republican,” Bennis wrote,
“At the end of the day, this isn’t about Hagel versus anybody. This is
about what President Obama is signaling by his nomination of Hagel as
Secretary of Defense....” She further explained, “Obama is not prepared
to allow either the pro-Israeli lobbies or the hard-core
neoconservatives, in and outside of Washington, to determine whom he
could and could not choose as Secretary of Defense….”
Bennis went on to applaud Hagel for his past remarks about the Defense
budget. “And then there’s the Pentagon budget. Hagel has called it
'bloated,' pretty amazing for a future Secretary of Defense.… [A]
Pentagon chief who actually believes his agency’s budget should be cut —
that’s new.” Her endorsement of Hagel concluded:
Standing to the left of President Obama’s center-right military policy
is not a very high bar. But again — standing up to AIPAC, the defense
industry (and members of Congress accountable to them) and the
still-powerful neocons makes the Hagel appointment a good move for
Obama. And it gives the rest of us a basis to push much farther to end
the wars, to close the bases, to cut the Pentagon funding, to tax the
military profiteers.
Phyllis Bennis also carries communist affiliations of her own. She was a
former member of the pro-Soviet Line of March, which was an “Oakland
based Maoist organization founded in 1970,” according to KeyWiki’s online database
of communists, socialists, and Marxist subversives. In 2008, Bennis was
voted to the steering committee of United for Peace and Justice, where
she worked alongside CPUSA leaders Judith LeBlanc and Libero Della
Piana.
United for Peace and Justice is also listed on the IPS website as one of its “Partner Organizations.”
Another IPS “Partner Organization” of note is the George Soros-funded
Ploughshares Fund, which has Chuck Hagel as a board member. Hagel shares
membership on the Ploughshares board with:
- John Hoyt, who also serves on Organizers’ Forum Board of the Democratic Socialists of America-run magazine Social Policy
- Cynthia Ryan, who has also served on the board of Van Jones’ Green For All.
- Kennette Benedict, the Executive Director & Publisher of the leftist anti-military Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists
- David Holloway, former member of the Board of Editors for the Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists
On January 9, 2013, the Ploughshares Fund applauded and congratulated
President Obama’s decision to nominate Hagel as Defense Secretary. The
Ploughshares Fund, like Global Zero and the IPS, also advocates vast
cuts to military defense spending and the reduction of U.S. nuclear
weapons, without an adequate missile defense system in place to defend
the country from potential ICBM (intercontinental ballistic missile)
attack.
Considering his voting record, affiliations, and key endorsements,
Hagel is unfit for the responsibilities expected of a Secretary of
Defense and his nomination may have grave implications with regards to
the defense of our country and the very policies that affect the brave
men and women of our nation’s armed forces.
Click here to email your senators and urge them to vote NO on the appointment of Chuck Hagel as Secretary of Defense.
Phone calls can also be very effective, and of course, the most
effective way to influence your senators and their staffs is by making
personal visits to their offices. Click here for contact information.
Click here to view this email alert as an online article.
Thanks.
Your Friends at The John Birch Society
Click here to view this email alert as an online article.
Thanks.
Your Friends at The John Birch Society
No comments:
Post a Comment