Thursday, June 13, 2013

One-size-fits-all system is immoral or Vote Libertarian


By Kent McManigal

As originally posted: Clovis News Journal
June 6, 2013

Most libertarians would be perfectly happy to stand aside as you form any society your little heart desires

You could form a democracy, republic, theocracy, dictatorship, or even a nostalgic “Communist Utopia.”

Whatever melts your butter.

It’s none of my business how you organize your community, as long as it is consensual.

As long as you give the rest of us the same respect.

Therein lies the problem.

Most forms of government don’t permit any competition, or even any real variety, in their vicinity, and the true believers tend to believe it’s OK to kill in order to prevent others from opting out or forming a parallel system.

They are even willing to risk everything they value and believe in just to prevent others from forming their own way of operating outside the one-size-fits-all system that is in fashion.

Instead of “live and let live” they prefer “if you don’t like it you have the same opportunity to vote to change the government that everyone else has.”

Besides being ridiculous and socially suicidal, they completely miss the point.

Since libertarians don’t fall for the belief that it’s right to force a minority to live under the rules of the majority — especially when those rules are understood to be immoral and unethical — then we know it would be wrong to do so even to impose what we know would be in everyone’s best interest.

The suggestion is like saying you must drink whiskey until you can manage to “vote” it into water. It’s not going to happen like that.

Libertarians are at a distinct disadvantage in this game since we can’t pretend it’s OK to kill people if they won’t agree to live by the Zero Aggression Principle, at least until they attack someone or the property of another. See the problem?

It’s amusing that those who claim their system is “best” seem the most terrified of allowing anyone the freedom to experiment with alternative ways. It’s as if they don’t really believe their own propaganda and are afraid that a better way might actually be found, and that it might become popular enough to replace their system.

The good news for you is that if libertarians ever become the majority, they’ll not interfere with you as long as you keep your hands to yourself and don’t damage the private property of those outside your group.

After all, we’ll always need living reminders around so our kids can see the folly of statism with their own eyes.

Farwell’s Kent McManigal champions liberty. Contact him at:


  1. A libertarian federal Gov might be okay domestically, but an impotent foreign policy would give the world to whoever wants it.

    I would not want a libertarian State government, though, too liberal.

    1. I want to be left alone, as Jefferson Davis wished.

    2. If you want to be left alone, you'll have to move out to the Alaskan bush. Otherwise, you have to deal with people who don't want to leave others alone.

      McManigal is hoping for mankind to reach a higher level of conscience and embrace the non aggression principle universally.

    3. I'm not going anywhere and they can kiss my royal, red rectum.:)