Unfortunately, Obama may well be doing this intentionally.
Why would Barack Obama want to give hundreds of millions of dollars of weapons to groups inside Syria that are selling weapons to ISIS and regularly fighting alongside them? Is he really that clueless about what is going on in the Middle East? The FSA and other groups of "moderate" fighters inside Syria do not consider ISIS to be an enemy. Rather, they consider ISIS to be an important ally in the struggle to overthrow the Syrian government.
In fact, many "moderate" units have actually joined ISIS in recent months. If Obama gives more weapons to the "moderate" fighters in Syria, it is inevitable that a lot of them will end up in the hands of ISIS. In a previous article, I already discussed how ISIS is talking over vast stretches of Syria and Iraq using mostly American weapons. If the Obama administration goes ahead with this plan to arm "moderates" in Syria, it is just going to make ISIS even stronger.
More @ The Economic Collapse
Obama is not clueless. He has been supporting terrorism and terrorists since he helped initiate the Arab Spring. He deposed stable leaders to create a vacuum and start the Caliphate. Everything he has done while in office has been done to advance Islam.
ReplyDeleteBadger
Certainly seems so.
DeleteBut when a long train of abuses and usurpations, pursuing invariably the same Object evinces a design to reduce them under absolute Despotism, it is their right, it is their duty, to throw off such Government, and to provide new Guards for their future security.
ReplyDeleteHow long a train of abuses and usurpations do we need?
The list of media-ignored scandals and abuses against the American Citizens is longer than anything Amtrak can put on the rails already...
is longer than anything Amtrak can put on the rails already...
DeleteAgreed.
We must strive to understand this; Obama is NOT the mastermind behind American foreign affairs. Even if he had enuff sense to be more correctly aware of foreign politics, including that of Syria, Iraq and ISIS, he is NOT the author of the speeches he gives, nor or those comments in his speeches necessarily his his own views.
ReplyDeleteWe must be aware that other people and groups controls the strings of government, just as those groups of people are responsible for having Obama elected president, they also are responsible for the policies he claims to support and initiate.
If for example, Obama was not president and Biden became president or was president, he would only continue the policies that has been dictated to Obama but now under his name.
Similar can be said if a Republican president came into power. Although while their speeches and opinions may appear to differ from the Democrats, they still lead to the same results. You can note that the policies of Bush were not radically altered with Obama but mainly restated in different ways which made it appear the two were vastly different in their ideologies. As George Wallace said it best, they are two sides of the same coin.
Unfortunately hoping that Obama is canned or is out of office will not solve the root of the problem. The problem will never be solved until the Khazar Bankers are kicked out along with their Federal Reserve system and the money turned back over to the people. Once they lose the Federal Reserve, they lose the ability to bribe congress, the president and the Federal courts. This is EXACTLY why the Khazar International Bankers are so mad at Putin and Russia, because he kicked them out in 2007 and they swore revenge on Putin and Russia. Can the same be done in the usa? I seriously doubt it... Meaning you are stuck with more of the same regardless who is your president.
Michael-- Deo Vindicabamur
just as those groups of people are responsible for having Obama elected president, they also are responsible for the policies he claims to support and initiate.
DeleteIndeed.