As some of those staunch defenders of our rights, in both Burns, Oregon, and Bunkerville, Nevada, decide to make a plea agreement with the prosecutors, the Internet has both armchair quarterbacks damning them and sympathetic supporters who will stand by their decision. However, perhaps it is necessary to look a little deeper into who those people, at both the Ranch and Refuge are, and to consider their respective objectives.
We can categorize those who participated in both events by comparing them to those who stood up against the British, 240 years ago. In so doing, there are three general categories, so that we can consider them in a contemporary context.
The first category is, for want of a better term, the politicos. Historically, these would be those who served on local and Provincial Committees of Safety and, those who went to Philadelphia and served in the Continental Congress. There may be others, such as newspaper editors and others who were outspoken against the British, so that we can lump them into this category, as well.
Now, in the past two years, we have, likewise, the politicos, those whose involvement is to challenge the government concerning both rights and that which should be right. Their objective is educational as well as political, desiring to provide understanding to other citizens as well as to attempt to get the government to stay within its limits and to remain obedient to the Constitution.
The second category is those with military inclinations. For the most part, they had prior military and leadership experience in the French and Indian wars. Their purpose was to use military force to protect the rights of Englishmen and defend against forces thrown against them.
More @ Outpost Of Freedom