“If there were chemical weapons in the building, we would not be here,” Saeed said. “My colleagues and I came here at 05:00 this morning. If there were chemical weapons, we would need to wear masks and take other protective measures to be staying here.”
The United States launched around 120 missiles targeting the Syrian government on Friday, and as reports of the damage surface, the evidence is showing that while the U.S. is bragging that the attack hit a chemical weapons facility, it actually destroyed a cancer research center.
The attacked launched by the United States, the United Kingdom and France, has reduced the Pharmaceutical and Chemical Industries Research Institute in Barzeh to rubble, according to a report from the Syrian Arab News Agency, which noted that the facility’s use “centered on preparing the chemical compositions for cancer drugs, and conducting chemical analyses of the materials entering Syria, which are used in pharmaceutical and food industries.”
More @ The Free Thought Project
Oh wow! Shades of the baby milk factory. LOL
ReplyDelete:)
DeleteBased on others' reviews, "The Free Thought Project" has suspect credibility. Researching the author, Rachel Blivens, one finds that she is ardently opposed to intervention in Syria and Afghanistan and strongly supports Hillary Clinton. She appears to be anti-everything. I'd label her as a liberal moonbat.
ReplyDeletestrongly supports Hillary Clinton
DeleteAll you need to know.
Assad should have just paid the bribe when Hillary demanded and none of this would be neccessary.
Delete--generic
What was the bribe?
DeleteWhatever Hillary demands. Arab springs were no coincedence. They were obvious protection rackets on an international scale. The Saudis paid. Libya, Egypt and Syria didn't.
ReplyDelete"Nice country you have there. It'd be a shame if something were to happen to it.
--generic
Arab springs were no coincidence
DeleteAbsolutely.