Thursday, February 14, 2019

The Stunning Statistical Fraud Behind The Global Warming Scare



Dated

Global Warming: The National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration may have a boring name, but it has a very important job: It measures U.S. temperatures. Unfortunately, it seems to be a captive of the global warming religion. Its data are fraudulent.

What do we mean by fraudulent? How about this: NOAA has made repeated "adjustments" to its data, for the presumed scientific reason of making the data sets more accurate.

Nothing wrong with that. Except, all their changes point to one thing — lowering previously measured temperatures to show cooler weather in the past, and raising more recent temperatures to show warming in the recent present.

This creates a data illusion of ever-rising temperatures to match the increase in CO2 in the Earth's atmosphere since the mid-1800s, which global warming advocates say is a cause-and-effect relationship. The more CO2, the more warming.

18 comments:

  1. It is a scam of monumental proportions. I was watching Tucker Carlson tonight as he "nailed" a Alexandria Ocasio Cortez "lieutenant's ass" to the side of a barn tonight in regards to this very subject. Tucker's point was "why doesn't the left go after China? They are the biggest polluters in the world. If the world only has twelve years to exist and if the true concern is saving the planet,,,,,,,,,,," Of course, the ididot couldn't respond with a coherent answer.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. " Of course, the ididot couldn't respond with a coherent answer.

      Par for the course.

      Delete
  2. My 'battle buddy' in the sandbox was a reservist who's civy job was as a scientist on NOAA ships.

    Confirms this article.

    Said testing thermometer towed behind the ship.

    Asked 'ya think that thermometer might get skewed data from warmer bilge water coming out the aft, and engine heat radiating from the prop shaft and prop?'

    Hmmmm. Joe T.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Asked 'ya think that thermometer might get skewed data from warmer bilge water coming out the aft, and engine heat radiating from the prop shaft and prop?'

      Excellent point.

      Delete
  3. Excellent Article Brock. Saw this as well. Nothing like a Conservative Troll of the Dumb and Dumber Dems.
    www.diogenesmiddlefinger.com/2019/02/brilliant-video-compares-green-new-deal.html


    ReplyDelete
  4. Hi, Brock - how is the weather manipulation going in the area
    you're in, California. I saw on the news that areas in California
    with heavy flooding, homes collapsing, roads that use to be, gone.
    They said they would own the weather by 2025; they already do.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I'm in Fallbrook, so you can see it on the map. Just some heavy rain and very windy earlier with warnings for rivers rising and flash floods. As far as I know, nothing much here. Thanks.

      Delete
  5. What's that line from a Jimmy Buffett song? "The weather is here, wish you were beautiful?" Sorry, way off on a tangent...LOL.....Ron W

    ReplyDelete
  6. And I'm not a "climate denier". The climate is here and yes, oh yes, there has been and will be "climate change". For instance, there was a period of warming during the Middke Ages and then a "little Ice Age" during the 16th and 17th Centuries. Generally warming has been good climate change and cooling, not so good. The ridiculous idea now is that CO2 is a pollutant. No, it's an essential natural compound of the lifecycle which operates within photosynthesis to produce greenery. How ironic, that the "Green New Deal" considers CO2 a bad thing! --Ron W

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. it's an essential natural compound of the lifecycle which operates within photosynthesis to produce greenery.

      Something that I learned in the 7th grade, I believe.

      Delete
  7. As someone who makes a living in a STEM field... there are many factors that made me switch from being concerned about CO2 emissions to not, but the two main ones are:

    1. A lack of transparency. In a SCIENCE people critique and work to replicate studies. To do this they need access to the original data and methodology. The BS "climate scientists" deny access to both. RED FLAG LIKE CRAZY.

    2. "Climate change" as presented is not falsifiable. This violates one of the fundamental aspects of science - the ability to prove something wrong. If, as they claim, it's CLIMATE CHANGE no matter whether it's warmer, colder, wetter, drier, calmer, or stormier, then there's no test or standard against which it could be measured to prove it false.

    There are other reasons too - like verifiable fraud, the fact that back when it was a new ice age coming the remedy was exactly the same - more power to government, lowered standards of living, and population control.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Thanks.https://freenorthcarolina.blogspot.com/2019/02/comment-on-stunning-statistical-fraud.html

      Delete
  8. Carbon tax! Reduce your "carbon footprint"! Carbon is a primary element of our bodies so this agenda is a message from the rulin elites that WE OWN YOU!
    --Ron W

    ReplyDelete