Senator Cornyn leads battle against Veterans Gun Ban
There’s been a lot of gun news this week. Votes in the full Senate. Votes in the Senate Judiciary
Committee. The gun battle has finally begun.
But first, we start with an incredible victory.
Halligan goes down to defeat
On
Wednesday, Senate Republicans successfully filibustered the nomination
of Caitlin Halligan for a seat on the DC Court of Appeals. By a vote of
51-41, all of the Republicans hung tight — except for Senator Lisa
Murkowski who voted for the anti-gun, liberal Halligan. (Alaska, she
needs to hear from you!)
There
was a barrage of grassroots’ opposition against Halligan, and people in
the media took notice of your action following the vote on Wednesday:
* Watchdog.org reported that, "Gun
Owners of America led the attack" against Halligan.
* Politico said that “Gun Owners of America [called] Halligan
‘one of the most anti-gun judicial nominees in recent memory.’”
* And Roll Call reported that, “Senate GOP leaders circulated an email highlighting the view of the GOA and other critics.”
And
thank you for your hard work and exercising your citizenship duties by
communicating with your Senators. It has paid off once again. Well
done!
Defeat of Veterans Gun Ban now within
reach
The
Senate Judiciary Committee took up the subject of gun control on
Thursday and passed S. 54, the Veterans Gun Ban, a bill which now moves
to the Senate floor.
Senator John Cornyn (R-TX) spoke for all gun owners when he vigorously opposed the bill in committee, explaining that:
This
bill would make it a serious felony [up to 15 years in prison] for an
American Legion employee to negligently transfer a raffled firearm to a
veteran who unknown to the transferor suffers from PTSD. — Senator John
Cornyn (R-TX)
The
committee adjourned without finishing
its business, and it will reconvene later to take up several more gun
bills. But the good news in all of this is that the Republican
opposition was virtually united, thus making a
filibuster on the Senate floor very achievable.
Although
this legislative pile of bunk is wrapped up in a pretty package labeled
“gun trafficking” (which is already illegal), the bill would (at its
core) send you to prison for 15 years if you:
- Negligently sold two or more guns;
- Negligently gave a gun as a gift;
- Negligently raffled a gun.
What
do we mean by “negligence”? Well, 150,000 law-abiding veterans are
currently barred from owning firearms, without any due process of law.
And any person who smokes
marijuana — including medical marijuana — is prohibited from owning a
firearm under 18 U.S.C. 922(g)(3).
So, if you sell a gun to
any of these people, without realizing that they are subject to a gun ban, you can go to prison for 15 years.
Anti-gun Chairman Patrick Leahy did everything he could to cut off debate on S. 54 — showing clear irritation at any senator who dared to raise questions with respect to its provisions.
That said, seven of the eight Republicans on the committee voted against S. 54, the Veterans Gun Ban — Senators
Jeff Sessions (AL), Jeff Flake (AZ), Lindsey Graham (SC), John Cornyn
(TX), Ted Cruz (TX), Orrin Hatch (UT) and Mike Lee (UT). They all
deserve your support and thanks.
And
the eighth, Ranking Republican Chuck Grassley, left open the
possibility that he would vote against it on the floor unless it was
amended.
Stalinist commies will kill you. It doesn't make any difference to them how they kill. Drones, firearms, fire, or starvation in gulags are some methods.
ReplyDeleteAll vets should be armed as should all patriots. Bonus march come to mind?
Stack 'em high - Stalinist commies, that is.
Bonus march come to mind?
DeleteIf a similar one was attempted, it would need to be done in Virginia so everyone could be armed.
Just suppose.....just suppose one could organize a march of 1,000 veterans armed with Armalites right into DC....to the steps of the Capitol. Just suppose.
DeleteEvery TV in every house in the world would be turned on if they knew about it.
Delete