After Dwight Eisenhower’s pick for Chief Justice of the Supreme Court usurped legislative power from Congress with the unconstitutional Brown vs Board of Education opinion, his Justice Department was ordered to make an example of Arkansas. The following is excerpted from the television and radio address given by Arkansas Governor Orval E. Faubus on 26 September 1957. Bernhard Thuersam
“Is Every Right Reserved to the States Now Lost?”
“My Fellow Citizens---
On Tuesday, September 24,
while I was still absent from the State, attending the Southern
Governors’ Conference at Sea Island, Georgia, the cleverly conceived
plans of the Justice Department under Herbert Brownell for the military
occupation of Arkansas were placed in execution. One thousand two
hundred troops of the 101st Airborne Division were flown into
the Jacksonville Air Base (near Little Rock) by air transport from Fort
Campbell, Kentucky. Immediately thereafter, these troops occupied, in
force, the grounds of Central High School.
At
the same time, the entire Arkansas National Guard and Air Guard were
federalized, and are now part of the United States Army and the United
States Air Force. We are now an occupied territory.
Evidence
of the naked force of the Federal Government is here apparent in these
unsheathed bayonets in the backs of schoolgirls---in the backs of
students---and in the bloody face of this railroad worker, who was
bayoneted and then felled by the butt of a rifle in the hands of a
sergeant of the United States 101st Airborne Division. This
man, on private property, as a guest in a home two blocks from the
school, has been hospitalized. Others have suffered bayonet wounds from
the hands of the United States Army soldiers. Your New York papers
also show the scenes.
Up
until the time the injunction was issued against me by the imported
federal judge, the peace had been kept in Little Rock by as few as 30
National Guardsmen. Not a blow was struck, no injury inflicted on any
person, and no property damage sustained. Neither was it necessary to
make wholesale arrests of Arkansas citizens. No bayonets were used, and
the weapons of Guardsmen were never loaded.
This
is quite a contrast to the present situation, when some 12,000 United
States Army troops are on duty, mobilized or standing ready for use. It
is in stark contrast also to the use of sharpened, naked bayonets on
schoolgirls and other Arkansas citizens, the bludgeoning of others with
rifle butts, and the wholesale arrests made by these United states
military forces.
I
wish to also point out that no violence broke out in the city until
after the injunction was issued by the imported federal judge, and the
Guard forces withdrawn.
It
might be well to mention briefly the actions of this imported judge in
the first three hearings: An injunction was issued by a State court,
presided over by Chancery Judge Murray Reed, staying the execution date
of the integration order, in order to preserve the peace. Judge Reed’s
order was issued after taking sworn testimony in open court, with
cross-examination of all witnesses. The first hearing in federal court,
before the imported judge, lasted one hour and five minutes. No
testimony whatsoever was taken. Only the argument of counsel was heard,
after which the judge made his order, nullifying the order of the State
court. The type-written order of the federal court was then
distributed, which had already been drawn up and ready before the
hearing was held.
The
second hearing took a total of four minutes. No testimony was taken
and the order---“integrate forthwith”---was issued. The third hearing
consumed a total of 15 minutes. Some testimony was taken---you can
judge how much---but the imported judge stated that no cross-examination
was necessary and then his order was issued.
The
total time consumed in all three hearings was one hour and 24 minutes,
on litigation pertaining to a matter of such great import. Not only was
the matter of integration-segregation involved, but also the matter of
jurisdiction of State courts to maintain the peace, and the
all-important matter of States rights, if there are any such rights
remaining at this time.
During World War II, my division, the 35th Infantry, pushed up on the right of the Fourth Armored Division to relieve the 101st
Airborne, and my division occupied the embattled city of Bastogne.
Today, we find members of the famed division, which I helped to rescue,
in Little Rock, Arkansas, bludgeoning innocent bystanders, with bayonets
in the backs of schoolgirls, and the warm, red blood of American
citizens staining the cold, naked unsheathed knives.
In
the name of God, whom we all revere, in the name of liberty we hold so
dear, in the name of decency, which we all cherish---what is happening
in America? Is every right reserved to the States by the Federal
Constitution now lost? Does the will of the people, that basic precept
of democracy, no longer matter? Must the will of the majority now
yield, under federal force, to the will of the minority regardless of
the consequences?
If
the answer to these questions are in the affirmative, then the basic
principles of democracy are destroyed, and we no longer have a union of
States under a republican form of government. If this be true---then
the States are mere subdivisions of an all-powerful Federal Government,
these subdivisions being nothing more than districts for the operation
of federal agents and federal military forces---forces which operate
without any regard for the rights of a sovereign State or its elected
officials, and without due regard to personal and property rights.
In
addition to the federal military forces, we have . . . in Arkansas a
federal judge from a State a thousand miles away. He has no
understanding whatsoever of the difficulties of our problems in the
field of race relations. [He and a few dissatisfied citizens] . . . are
the ones who have sought to advise the President’s “palace guard” about
the Little Rock situation. They bear a heavy responsibility for the
unhappy events of the past few days. Would it not have been better for
the President’s advisers to listen to officials who have the people’s
confidence, as shown by the greatest of all democratic processes, the
free exercise of the franchise at the ballot box?
Still
further, in Arkansas, literally swarms of FBI . . . Counterintelligence
Corps and the Criminal Investigation Division [agents] have been
combing the area for days. Teen-aged schoolgirls have been taken by the
FBI and held incommunicado for hours of questioning while their frantic
parents knew nothing of their whereabouts. To those who know the facts
of the Little Rock situation, these combined actions on the part of the
judicial, executive and military departments of the Federal Government,
are “police state” methods in a form never before seen in America.
Prior
to this time in Arkansas, the hand of fellowship and mutual
self-respect has everywhere been extended between the races. Much
progress has been made in this field, and in others pertaining to the
progress of the State and the human welfare of all citizens. Under my
administration, all transportation systems have been integrated, and
without serious incidents. Six of the seven State-supported colleges
now have Negro students. In the other, there were no applicants.
I
was the first Democratic Governor of the South to place Negroes on the
Democratic State Central Committee. Negroes also serve on the
Republican Committee. Some years ago I was a member of the resolutions
committee which recommended to the Democratic State Convention that the
so-called white primary be abolished . . . Negroes have been appointed
on boards and commissions during my administration, and have been
appointed to administration positions never before held by members of
their race. Eight public schools have been peacefully integrated during
my administration, more than any other Southern State outside the
Border areas.
I
am not in this fight either as an ardent segregationist or an
integrationist. My only child, a son, is now attending classes in a
State-supported integrated college. This is more than can be said by
any of the high officials of the National Administration, who are
responsible for the military occupation of Arkansas.
There
can be no question of the supremacy of the United States Army, when
used against a defenseless State. I have been working and fighting for
the right of my people to solve their problems peacefully. I shall
continue relentlessly on this course. The Constitution, the traditions
of our republic and the will of the people uphold me in this course.
Our cause is just, and will ultimately prevail.
Today, the excuse for use of federal troops is said to be integration. Tomorrow,
in any State, the excuse could be a labor dispute, or any number of
things. The Supreme Court ruled that the President could not take over
the steel industry, but they have taken over our schools in Little
Rock.
I
appreciate the upwards of 100,000 letters and telegrams, from every
State in the union, which I have received, and which have ranged from 95
to 98 percent in support of my efforts to maintain the peace and good
order of my own State. We have had no opportunity at all to answer any
of them, but they are nonetheless appreciated. I know that the American
people have had time to think, and to learn about the facts of this
situation, they---in their good judgment---will rebuke the National
Administration for the ill-advised and unwarranted use of federal
troops. School attendance at bayonet point is not compatible with the
American way of life.
I
ask you: Is this the pledge that was made, that federal troops would
not be used? And if this be patience, then the word has new meaning.
Yet is was said here in Little Rock there was no imminence of disorder
when I called out the Guard to keep the peace---all in contrast to what I
said and what has transpired. My fellow citizens of Arkansas and of the
nation, this cross we here must bear---but as the poet said, “Even this
shall pass away.”
Good evening, God bless you fellow citizens.”
(US News & World Report, October 4th, 1957)
In looking at the posts that came up using the word "occupied" in the search box, I was pleased to read this.
ReplyDeleteI am grateful to read more of the truths of history.
Thanks very much for posting so much of what some of us were not taught at home, nor at school.
Looking for more from Gov. Orval himself, I found this film interview with Mike Wallace, from September 15, 1957.
https://hrc.contentdm.oclc.org/digital/collection/p15878coll90/id/28/
The sound and picture quality are better than the things I have found on youtube.
Mike Wallace's demeanor and behavior reminds me of some current media personalities, even if his words are more clearly enunciated than is the current style.
I naively thought that interviews were to found out what the person being interviewed thinks, rather than to coerce the person being interviewed into a different point of view. That plan of action is an altogether different kind of discussion.
It would be useful to know more of Gov. Faubus' thoughts on his choices. Some of his answers seemed to only touch on the answer, but not give the reason for this choices.
Both this post and the interview were usefully eye-opening, adding to what I understand of how the current circumstances came to be.
Thanks again!
Miss Emma
I naively thought that interviews were to found out what the person being interviewed thinks, rather than to coerce the person being interviewed into a different point of view.
DeleteBut you are being logical, how silly.....:) Thanks for the link.
I apologize for the typing errors.
ReplyDeleteMiss Emma
Didn't notice and a Happy Thanksgiving!
Delete