Monday, October 28, 2013

Pedophilia Now Classified As A Sexual Orientation

Via LH

 Pedophile Gay Rights (revised)

 

People can classify themselves as heterosexual, homosexual, asexual, metrosexual. There are endless sexual orientations under the sun, and now, pedophilia can be added to the list.

 

In the fifth edition of the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (DSM V), the American Psychological Association (APA) drew a very distinct line between pedophilia and pedophilic disorder. Pedophilia refers to a sexual orientation or profession of sexual preference devoid of consummation, whereas pedophilic disorder is defined as a compulsion and is used in reference to individuals who act on their sexuality.

 

APA’s decision has given rise to numerous pedophilia-advocacy groups, the chief of them being B4U-ACT, a non-profit grassroots organization based in Maryland. Created in 2003 primarily as a means for “minor-attracted persons” to be open about their sexual preferences in a supportive atmosphere, B4U-ACT is now widening the scope of their organization.

 

According to spokesperson and registered sex offender Paul Christiano, the pedophilia-advocacy group is “working towards de-stigmatizing the mental health community.” Christiano explained that negative societal attitudes towards minor-attracted persons “trickle down to policy-making and the mental health community.”

 

 More @ Sharia Unveiled

56 comments:

  1. That means we can shoot then legally right?

    ReplyDelete
  2. The capacity for 21st Century Amerika to invent cultural pathologies never ceases to amaze me. This is all very clever, and I'm convinced is premeditated. First get it accepted that merely having pedophilic fantasies doesn't hurt anyone--which, strictly speaking, is true, any more than having fantasies about running over your boss in the parking lot hurts anyone--then, later, claim that actual pedophilia is okay as long as it's "consensual" (as if such a thing were possible.) And the authors of DSM are playing along, for what reason or agenda God only knows. Somehow I don't foresee this ending well.

    ReplyDelete
  3. Touch my kids and you'll be reclassified as 'eunuch '

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Touch my children and you will be classified a DOA!

      Delete
    2. That is about all they would understand.

      Delete
    3. Reclassified to "missing person"

      Delete
    4. well.... How old are your kids. Are we talking about a 17 year old having sex with an 18 or 19 year old. A 15 year old having sex with another 15 year old. Or a 30 year old having sex with an 11 year old? technically all of those are statutory rape. But do we treat them all the same. is the 18 year old fantasizing about sex with the 16 or 17 year old as wrong as the 30 year old? Is it really as cut and dry as you thought? Isnt there a distinct difference? And if there is a difference then shouldn't that difference be defined for the purposes of diagnosis?

      Delete
    5. "a 17 year old having sex with an 18 or 19 year old" is not a statutory rape. Depending on a state, a 17 year old might be able to consent and in order for that to be statutory rape there shoul dbe 3+ years difference. 15 year olds having sex is not a statutory rape either but 30 and 11... that's a different story.

      Delete
    6. Thanks. I believe there is a state where a 16 year old can get consent..........?

      Delete
    7. age of consent in NV is 16

      Delete
    8. There has to be limits as a Judeo-Christian culture. Mormons took wives early and many. That wasn't acceptable. Many took to wives as early as 12, old enough to bleed, old enough to breed, back in the day. Well they were trying to populate the earth. And now we have cut, cut to far back. Those who crunch the numbers say that no one but the Muslims have enough offspring to keep what societies we have today. In 15-25 years none of which is today will exist but the Muslims if they last that long. Enough inbreeding has messed them up bad. Europe and us haven't done enough to keep what we have. That's the cold hard facts

      Delete
  4. Any grown man or woman lays a sexual hand on my daughters, they will cease to exist...I don't give a shit what these fucktard libs say...medical definition/expert bs.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. We have always been able to kill pedophiles, I beat em up everytime I see one who is registered. A piece of 4 by 3 block of wood works wonders. I see it this way, if the pedophile is in hospital getting over his / her injuries they are not molesting children. I get a kick out of kicking their teeth in.

      Delete
    2. Hey asswipe. I'm neither Democrat nor Republican but the constant use of the word liberal, and other intellectual variations such as libtard, ass an attempt to insult anyone who doesnt conform to right wing extremism is as repugnant as the idea that pedophilia is a sexual orientation. Keep your political ignorant bashing out of this.

      Delete
    3. Oh not now, but later as Islam is the law of the land. The mighty high Barack started it and will offer up his daughters who don't appreciate squat. So you'll be old when old men will come sniffing around, yours. Then they'll have to be mutilated to fit the norm and their children assaulted cause by then it'll be the new way. Sorry gramps, no say you

      Delete
  5. Honestly I knew this would eventually happen. That they would somehow justify pedophilia as a natural thing and they can't help it. Fantasies or not, they are only wrong when they are carried out. The sick part of it is that pedophiles do carry those out on young victims through coercion or threats cause if they scare that cold or successfully shame that child then the secret is safe. Well, I will never honor those sickos their "rights". If one touches any of my children, they forfeited their rights and they will have yo deal with me exercising my right to protect my children. Sick bastards.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I knew this would eventually happen

      Yes, we had been warned.

      Delete
    2. Actually molesting children is still considered a mental illness. It's only when they don't act on it that it's considered a sexual orientation.

      Delete
    3. How many people who have a specific sexual orientation not act on it? What is crazy is now they are starting to justify their actions as something that is natural for them. Well, as a person who has been a victim, it is only natural for me wanting to protect my child at any costs regardless whose rights I have violated.

      Delete
    4. they are starting to justify their actions as something that is natural for them.

      Indeed.
      =========
      wanting to protect my child at any costs regardless whose rights I have violated.

      Absolutely.

      Delete
    5. They say it's "natural" to be that way. I think it is quite natural to protect your children, your neighbor's children, anyone's children from danger. I wouldn't hesitate to do all with all means at my disposal.

      Delete
    6. I wouldn't hesitate to do all with all means at my disposal.

      You bet your sweet bippy!

      Delete
    7. You feed into one sickness, others want to join the fray of liberation. It's our nature. What use to be sick, is now raising children cause hetero young Moms and young Fathers don't want to tied down. So they filled a gap.

      Delete
  6. This doesn't surprise me one damn bit. You can bet your ass it's going to get a lot worse too. It will be a gradual transition of acceptance...just like racial segregation 50+ years ago...then gays in the last couple of decades...I'm afraid the tides WILL turn in those sick bastards' favor! Think about it...there used to be a time when hanging "niggers" was accepted as necessary, and beating and killing "fags" was what they deserved. No one really cared, and if they did they didn't speak up about it! Oh how times have changed! I don't care about the choices that adults make, as long as no one is hurt and it really consensual and BETWEEN ADULTS...who cares? But children are at the heart of this one, and I can only hope to God that this "tide" will never turn and God damn those who try to turn it!

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Thanks for the comment.
      =======
      hanging "niggers" was accepted as necessary,

      & whites.

      27.4% Of Lynchings Were White
      http://www.namsouth.com/viewtopic.php?t=2538&highlight=tuskegee
      "Tuskegee Institute records of lynchings between the years 1880 and 1951 show 3,437 African-American victims, as well as 1,293 white victims."

      Delete
    2. It may be the straw that broke the camels back. End of times, rapture, judgment day

      Delete
  7. As a victim when a child I hope to God this never becomes accepted and commonplace. A child does not have the means to defend themselves and I believe would never choose to be used in this way by any adult. This is totally ridiculous. As adults we need to protect the children...and deal with the sick adults...not normalize their behavior.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Absolute and thank you for the comment.

      Delete
    2. I sit here with tears rolling down my eyes knowing that this has happen to our family and friends and they got away with it. It's sad and not fare we have to suffer for the rest of our lives for their actions. Now we have to let them justify their actions by not calling what it really is. Where can someone one sign up to stop this from happening.....

      Delete
    3. Now we have to let them justify their actions by not calling what it really is.

      The ultimate travesty.

      Delete
  8. In our PC world wouldn't this at least be called extreme bullying? We're a country where the godless are making the rules. And the rest of us have to sit by and watch as our nation goes to hell. I always knew there would come a time, I just always thought years ago it would happen in my children's or grand children's lifetime. Well we've come a long way baby, to get to the gutter mentality of the godless. God wins. What some may think doesn't mean squat. But it does impact the lives of all people.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. it does impact the lives of all people.

      Terribly so. It's difficult to believe that this is the same country where I was raised. There is only one solution for commies, as even the most naive must realize by now.

      Delete
  9. These sick fucks believe that a child of 10 years can possibly understand the consequences of consenting to and engaging in a sexual act with anyone are out of their f***ing minds!!! There is every proof in the world that sex with a child is damaging on so many levels.
    If they think it is OK for a pedophile to engage in a sexual act with a child, let them offer their own children up for the experience. ANYONE comes near my child with the intent to defile him before he is of legal consenting age, they best be prepared to lose their genitals (slowly of course) as well as their life after they have been forced to consume them!

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Yes, an 18 year old with a 17 year old IS statuatory rape in a number of states.... but the bigger question is this: If we were still a society that valued marriage, would agree of consent be as big of a deal? Ifallowed our daughters to be married off to established men rather than this whole push to "do it on your own", presumably it wouldn't really matter how old they were as they would (in the right marriage) be respected loved and cared for. Does it really matter if your daughter is 11 or 25 when she is finally with a guy if she winds up getting banged out by a couple different guys a month and pregnant with no dad in the picture or does respect have an age of consent? Before age of consent laws, the out of wedlock pregnancy rate wasn't 79% and the men who abuse women number hasn't changed at all. I'm all for freedom...but not freedom from righteousness which is how it is being used and at great cost...and righteousness in this situation has no age requirement. If this was about loving God and honoring God and Jesus Christ in a relationship, then the relationship would be a marriage and age would be irrelevant. Even if the girl was married off too young for consummation, a man who loves Christ would never harm his wife, ergo he would wait until she was ready. Unlike the Muslim marry off where the woman is an object and if she dies on the wedding night from sex at too young an age, a Christian man would respect and care for his wife as if she was himself. Under those guidelines, I cannot imagine being angry if a 35 year old was with my 10 year old daughter. However, if she is being disrespected via being used sexually at age 25, I'm gonna be pissued about it. The laws on the books about age of consent is one more lack of freedom. It should be a family to family decision. ....not a government oversight. And no, I'm not planning to marry my 10 year old off to someone....well... unless he brings at least 7 sheep and 4 goats. Hahaha jk jk

      Delete
    2. unless he brings at least 7 sheep and 4 goats. Hahaha jk jk

      :) Priceless, except for the horrifically, bad situation that the work has brought.

      Delete
  10. You DO know this is pretty much The Onion, right?

    ReplyDelete
  11. Quit insulting onions as I love them.....:)

    ReplyDelete
  12. This is horrible and a "gateway drug" to acceptance of these deviants.. there should be a one strike law against these people... you act on it one time... you get the needle..

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. you get the needle..

      Or whatever one chooses.

      Delete