Wednesday, March 24, 2021

US Appeals court rules Americans don’t have right to open (or concealed ) carry guns in public

 https://americanmilitarynews.com/wp-content/uploads/1200px-New_Hampshire_Open_Carry_2009.jpg

Some gun rights activists have looked to Justice Amy Coney Barrett’s appointment to the Supreme Court as a development that could once again bring second amendment cases back to the highest court in the U.S. In an October interview with CNN, Jacob D. Charles, executive director of the Center of Firearms Law at Duke Law said, “As a circuit judge, Justice Barrett showed a readiness to invoke the Second Amendment to strike down gun regulations, and she is likely to vote with the other justices eager to take up a Second Amendment case.”

On Wednesday, an en banc panel of the US Court of Appeals for the 9th Circuit ruled that the second amendment right to keep and bear arms does not citizens include the right to carry a firearm, either openly or concealed, in public .

The court issued the ruling in the case of George Young Jr. V Hawaii, a lawsuit challenging a Hawaii firearm licensing law, which states residents seeking license to openly carry a firearm in public must demonstrate “the urgency or the need” to carry a firearm, must be of good moral character, and must be “engaged in the protection of life and property.” The court said, “There is no right to carry arms openly in public; nor is any such right within the scope of the Second Amendment.”

More @ American Military News

15 comments:

  1. A predictable ruling from the Ninth Circus Court....and win the current corrupted SCOTUS don't expect this ruling to be overturned. This ruling WILL be The foundation the left will use to roll back all the CCW laws passed in the past 40 years. They want us TOTALLY disarmed....and helpless....all the time, everywhere.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Good chance they will at least hear it.

      Some gun rights activists have looked to Justice Amy Coney Barrett’s appointment to the Supreme Court as a development that could once again bring second amendment cases back to the highest court in the U.S. In an October interview with CNN, Jacob D. Charles, executive director of the Center of Firearms Law at Duke Law said, “As a circuit judge, Justice Barrett showed a readiness to invoke the Second Amendment to strike down gun regulations, and she is likely to vote with the other justices eager to take up a Second Amendment case.”

      Delete
  2. Actually the odds are the SCOTUS won't hear an appeal of this ruling. They can decline to hear it which would effectively be a rubber stamp approval of this 2A violation. If the left can blackmail SCOTUS into ignoring the blatant theft of a presidential election keeping them from meddling with a circuit court ruling they like would be child's play.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Politics is war by other means. Government is the ultimate expression of violence. And violence is the ONLY language the left cares about or will respond to. It is now us or them. To the death. THEY understand this fact....and are acting accordingy. Most normal Americans cannot or will not accept this ugly reality. If that doesn't change....and soon, we are doomed

      Delete
    2. Cut off their TV's and we'll get them in the streets. :)

      Delete
  3. How many Divisions does the 9th Circuit Court of Appalling Idiots have? It is gonna take quite a few to even attempt to disarm us...

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. :) As I remember, Trump appointed one or two so, it's not as bad as before.

      Delete
    2. He appointed ten.
      https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States_Court_of_Appeals_for_the_Ninth_Circuit#Current_composition_of_the_court
      Still, the court is almost evenly split, considering how the Bush nominated judges tend to vote, and how many Clinton nominees are still there.

      Delete
  4. Funny how for Democratic party activist judges, no issued is ever "settled law" until it goes their way. I'm pretty sure the Supreme court already settled this matter.

    --Generic

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Truth crushed to the earth is truth still and like a seed will rise again.
      ---Jefferson Davis (1808 - 1889)
      --------
      “A question settled by violence or in disregard of law must remain unsettled forever.”
      --------
      "The contest is not over, the strife is not ended. It has only entered upon a new and enlarged arena.
      ---Address to the Mississippi legislature - 16 years after the wars end.

      https://www.namsouth.com/viewtopic.php?t=2978&highlight=jefferson+davis+quotes

      Delete
  5. On its face, this would appear to fly in the face of current Supreme Court decisions. Hard to argue this is a "reasonable" restriction. And the court should be a bit more friendly than the Heller court.

    ReplyDelete
  6. This is Bull Schifft and we all know it, they know it, the Police Unions Know it. We ALL Know it! ...However Brock, just like constipation issues, difficult arithmetic problems can be worked out with a sharp pencil... here is a dated Article that shall never lose it's strength and TRUTHS. It is indeed dated on BOTH sides of the Equation, but it still Works things out. The Answer is always going to be a bloody mess. I found it at Irish's Place first then went to the source, Here:

    https://survivalblog.com/2018/05/15/mathematics-countering-tyranny

    Cheers

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Thanks.https://freenorthcarolina.blogspot.com/2021/03/comment-on-us-appeals-court-rules.html

      Delete