Tuesday, November 13, 2012

Election Fraud? Barack Obama Won More Than 99 Percent Of The Vote In More Than 100 Ohio Precincts

Roundabout via Billy


Barack Obama received more than 99% of the vote in more than 100 precincts in Cuyahoga County, Ohio on election day.  In fact, there were a substantial number of precincts where Mitt Romney got exactly zero votes.  So how in the world did this happen?  Third world dictators don’t even get 99% of the vote.  Overall, Mitt Romney received 30.12%of the vote in Cuyahoga County.  There were even a bunch of precincts in Cuyahoga County that Romney actually won.  But everyone certainly expected that Cuyahoga County would be Obama territory.  And in most of the precincts that is exactly what we saw - large numbers of votes for both candidates but a definite edge for Obama.  

However, there are more than 100 precincts in Cuyahoga County where the voting results can only be described as truly bizarre.  Yes, we always knew that urban areas would lean very heavily toward Obama, but are we actually expected to believe that Obama got over 99% of the votes in those areas?  In more than 50 different precincts, Romney received 2 votes or less.  Considering how important the swing state of Ohio was to the national election, one would think that such improbable results would get the attention of somebody out there.  Could we be looking at evidence of election fraud hidden in plain sight? 

Perhaps if there were just one or two precincts where Obama got more than 99% of the vote we could dismiss the results as “statistical anomalies” and ignore them.

But there were more than 100 precincts where this happened in the most important swing state in the nation.

Maybe there is some rational explanation for the numbers that you are about to see.  If there is, I would really love to hear it.

3 comments:

  1. That's just so statistically unlikely as to be virtually impossible. It's right up there with me waking up tomorrow weighing 175 lbs, or pigs spontaneously sprouting wings.

    ReplyDelete
  2. Nope, it is a near certainty when dealing with the "Chicago Machine" I am suprised that the totals were only 100%, since I will bet all the graveyards were registered too.

    ReplyDelete
  3. It's right up there with me waking up tomorrow weighing 175 lbs, or pigs spontaneously sprouting wings.

    a near certainty when dealing with the "Chicago Machine" I am suprised that the totals were only 100%, since I will bet all the graveyards were registered too.

    :)

    ReplyDelete