Monday, January 21, 2013

NY Republican Assemblyman Shows What Democrats Are Really After: Gun Confiscation

 188904_1697153386809_1177087664_31473687_8312623_n

New York State Assemblyman Steve McLaughlin provides video evidence that New York, despite passing massive legislation into law against the Second Amendment demonstrates that Democrats had even more “secret” legislation they wanted kept from the public eye. McLaughlin provided video evidence to demonstrate that documents his claims.

On his Facebook page, McLaughlin not only shared the video, but also the following:
Here it is. This is the video where I was asked to keep the Democrat proposals for the NY SAFE Act away from the public. This list was given to me by a colleague and it is not confidential.
This bill was an attack on the 2nd amendment and the Democrats clearly wanted to dismantle the work of the Founding Fathers. None of these amendments were included in the final bill thanks to us fighting back. I will not stand silent while these unpatriotic proposals are pathetically thrown at us a 11 o’clock at night:
1. Confiscation of “assault weapons”
2. Confiscation o ten round clips
3. Statewide database for ALL Guns
4. Continue to allow pistol permit holder’s information to be replaced to the public
5. Label semiautomatic shotguns with more than 5 rounds or pistol grips as “assault weapons”
6. Limit the number of rounds in a magazine to 5 and confiscation and forfeiture of banned magazines
7. Limit possession to no more than two (2) magazines
8. Limit purchase of guns to one gun per person per month
9. Require re-licensing of all pistol permit owners
10. Require renewal of all pistol permits every five years
11. State issued pistol permits
12. Micro-stamping of all guns in New York State
13. Require licensing of all gun ammo dealers
14. Mandatory locking of guns at home
15. Fee for licensing, registering weapons

2 comments:

  1. Kinda wish that they did. They would have removed any doubts, and the war would have started while I am still young (65) enough to participate in a meaningful way.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Frankly, I believe the 50/60/70 year olds will participate to a larger extent than those young, though I will be more than happy to be wrong.

      Delete