Tuesday, June 3, 2014

NC: Urgent Message from Rep. Pittman about Common Core

 State Rep. Larry G. Pittman (R-NC)
 President Barack Obama is not a traitor because his actions have not been disloyal to Kenya.
 
For those of you who have been waiting to hear what is happening with Common Core, I have good news.  After a lot of hard work over the last couple of weeks, Rep. Craig Horn, Rep. Bryan Holloway, Rep. Michael Speciale, and I finally settled on a proposed committee substitute for the bill that came out of the study committee.  I wrote four versions, Rep. Speciale wrote one, and Rep. Horn wrote 23 before we finally agreed on it enough to run it through the House Education Committee this morning.  The PCS passed the committee with no amendments by a vote of 26-17.  It will be on the calendar for tomorrow when the House convenes at 4:30 PM

Some of the improvements I put into this bill include:

1.   The Academic Review Study Commission the bill creates will now be a permanent commission.  The State Board of Education will have to work with the Commission when the Board reviews educational standards for the State of North Carolina every five years.

2.  Not only is Common Core removed from our State Statutes, but the State Board of Education is not allowed to use assessments developed by the Smarter Balanced Consortium Assessments or the Partnership for Assessments of Readiness of College and Careers.

3.  The State Board is required to ensure that standards are age and developmentally appropriate, and that “no official, employee, agency, or board of the State shall enter into any agreement, memorandum of understanding, or contract with any federal agency or private entity which in any way cedes or limits State discretion or control over the development, adoption, or revision of the North Carolina Standard  Course of Study and related student assessments in the public school system, including, but not limited to, agreements, memoranda of understanding, and contracts in exchange for funding for public schools and programs.”  I didn’t write it in those words.  That’s the legalese way of saying that they are not allowed to apply for or accept federal grants that give the federal government control of our standards, curriculum, or assessments.

The State Board is required to collaborate with the new Commission “to maintain the independence” of our State standard course of study.

4.  “No personally identifiable date on students or their families’ religion, political party affiliation, biometric information, psychometric data or voting history shall be collected, tracked, housed, reported or shared with the federal government.  No personally identifiable student data shall be collected for the purpose of the development of commercial products or services.”

As I say, I had help with the wording of these provisions in the bill; but they are all matters I insisted on including.  There was some resistance to some of them; but I kept insisting on putting them back in until they stuck.  Unfortunately, the schools will have to continue on the current standards from Common Core for the coming year, until they are replaced.  There is no way I could avoid that, as we cannot go forward with no standards, and there was no willingness to go back to the standards as they were before Common Core.  However, while continuing to use the standards that are in place for that one year, we have made it clear that changes may be made during that time, and that there is to be no further development based on Common Core for the future.


I am very pleased that we will at long last be considering this bill on the floor of the House tomorrow.  There will be efforts to amend it to death, as there were in committee; but I believe we shall prevail in the end.  Thanks to everyone who has supported my efforts and those of my colleagues with whom I have worked on this thus far.  We still have to get it through the rest of the process.  It may get changed some when we send it over to the Senate, as well.  I will do all that I can to resist any weakening of the bill, and I ask that you let the rest of the Legislature know of your support for it as it is.  Some of you may not consider it strong enough; but I don’t know how to make it any stronger at this point, and I believe this is as good a bill as we’re going to get.

God bless,
Rep. Pittman

No comments:

Post a Comment