It may be surprising to hear, but it is a plain historical fact that modern international jihad originated as an instrument of US foreign policy. The “great menace of our era” was built up by the CIA to wage a proxy war against the Soviets.
A 1973 coup in Afghanistan installed a new secular government that, while not fully communist, was Soviet-leaning. That was a capital offense from the perspective of America’s Cold War national security state, at the time headed by Henry Kissinger.
Conveniently for Kissinger, the dirt poor country was sandwiched between two US client states:
Pakistan to the east and Iran (then still ruled by the CIA-installed Shah) to the west. Immediately after the coup, the CIA and the clandestine security agencies of Pakistan (ISI) and Iran (SAVAK) began regime change operations in Afghanistan, orchestrating and sponsoring Islamic fundamentalist insurrections and coup attempts.
Due to these efforts, as well as the government’s own oppressiveness, a widespread rebellion broke out in Afghanistan in 1978.
More with video @ Zero Hedge
Is there a specific reason this photo is being promoted? Even teenagers, 150yrs ago, knew cannonballs bounced off Ironclad ships. Newtonian physics has been conceded, even by the catholic church, for five centuries. Isn't it about time to drop the war mongering narrative, that contradicts physics, which is 100% REPEATABLE by definition?
ReplyDeleteMSM is generated north of the Mason Dixon line, and they have managed to brainwash the general public into believing things that only happen in cartoons. Many people resist through cognitive dissonance, not even realizing the truth is more than they are willing to grasp. It comes down to this basic statement:
Aluminum in free space can NOT penetrate a larger piece of rigid structural steel at subsonic speed (STP@SL).
There are two ways to be fooled. One is to believe what isn't true. The other is to refuse to accept what is true.~ Soren Kierkegaard
The highest form of ignorance is when you reject something you don't know anything about.~ W. Dyer
Mediocre minds usually dismiss anything which reaches beyond their own understanding.~ Francois de La Rochefoucauld
Prof of concept can be seen in history, as a B-25 Mitchell struck the Empire State building July 28th, 1945. The facade of the ESB is granite, and masonry has negligible tensile strength(<1Ksi). Tensile strength is what keeps a material from being pulled apart (penetrated) and structural steel can withstand over 88Ksi (THE strongest tensile strength building material used in quantity, even today). The aircraft punched a 18ft x 20ft hole in the facade, yet the wing span is over 67 feet. Many publication try to avoid discussing the air frame, as it fell to a lower roof terrace and the street level.
To arrive at a contradiction is to confess an error in one's thinking; to maintain a contradiction is to abdicate one's mind and to evict oneself from the realm of reality.~ Ayn Rand
The crisis of today is the joke of tomorrow.~ H. G. Wells
Having once shot a steel car rim with a handgun, this is a clear example of how penetration is not possible. The bullet is 10x the density of water and travels at the speed of sound (just under 1200ft/sec, for STP@SL). But we are expected to believe an aluminum projectile that floats on water (Sully's airliner in the Hudson river, indicating .2 mass density compared to water) and can only travel about 500ft/sec, is able to perpetuate over 126 feet through steel without stopping. This is absurd, as it would only takes a constant force of 50g to stop any projectile moving 500ft/sec, in 63 feet. Formula 1 cars have recorded survived impacts from 85-140+g, crumpling the car body less than 2ft, in 200mph crashes.
As the kinematic equation shows, 1/2 Mass(Velocity squared), the velocity is exponential compared to mass, a linear function. From the standpoint of metallurgy, the shear modules of aluminum is 25 Gpa, where as basic steel is 70 Gpa. Even the construction technique of using sheet metal to fabricate planes, lends itself to the dissipation of energy through crumpling. Examples can be seen in uni-body construction of cars to meet impact safety requirements, a practice started before 1980.
In conclusion, the carppetbagger's hoax that commercial airliners hit the WTC, can easily be disproved by observation of physics and metallurgy. Even basic math shows the energy needed would be one thousand times greater than a commercial airliner could generate, that's three orders of magnitude. NOT PHYSICALLY POSSIBLE!
Please, if anyone has a contradiction to note let's hear it, and don't start in w/ materials that do not even have ionic bonding. ie wood, glass, silly putty. Just present an example that proves any statement made to be wrong.
I imagine the world would be a whole lot quieter place, if The South had prevailed back then.
ReplyDeleteAt the least, the US government probably wouldn't be the worlds foremost instigator ( country-wise ) of chaos.
Central Alabamaian
Absolutely.
DeleteWell said.
DeleteThe twin towers were blown up by explosives. Employees at the towers said they
ReplyDeletewere forced to leave their offices with the excuse the workers needed to do some
work inside the offices. The employees stated they heard drilling going on in all the
offices being worked on. The 'insiders' were drilling holes in the walls planting
the explosives. You could see the explosives going off as the buildings crumbled
and the bodies were expelled with each explosion. This is where Trump saw
bodies falling though many did jump or try to slide down the openings in the
outside building. He did see cheering protesters but they weren't muslims or arabs.
And this is what he was implying without stating outright.
Thanks.
Delete