Saturday, August 24, 2013

Paul Sheehan’s The Race War of Blacks Against Whites

Via Billy

http://sphotos.xx.fbcdn.net/hphotos-ash3/p480x480/549578_10150710780872472_509187471_9478551_133723530_n.jpg


Statistics seem to point out that blacks have been targeting whites since the 1960s.

The ongoing racial tension is being exacerbated by a media which refuses to truthfully and faithfully report details about crimes occurring between and/or against the races. The race war of blacks on whites is being denied. Remembering just how much detail was foisted upon us (as well as dutifully ignored) during the Trayvon Martin/George Zimmerman tragedy and seeing how often the media ignores or downplays the crimes by blacks against whites is enough to make a sensible and intelligent person question the media’s motives. Of course, those on the left question nothing except why people like me are bringing it up in the first place.

Blacks-Beating-WhitesSome years ago, an Australian by the name of Paul Sheehan wrote an article called “The Race War of Black Against White” and it appeared in The Sydney Morning Herald (1995). Mr. Sheehan’s opening statement was, “The longest war America has ever fought is the Dirty War, and it is not over. It has lasted 30 years so far and claimed more than 25 million victims. It has cost almost as many lives as the Vietnam War. It determined the result of last year’s congressional election.”

Exactly which war is he referring to here? “No matter how crime figures are massaged by those who want to acknowledge or dispute the existence of a Dirty War, there is nothing ambiguous about what the official statistics portray: for the past 30 years a large segment of black America has waged a war of violent retribution against white America.”

2 comments:

  1. One of the many reasons that we are are armed, trained, and determined to use lethal force if needed to protect ourselves, family and innocent victims of violence.

    That is not a racial statement, just a statement of fact.

    Bob
    III

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Absolutely. Back again to: I'd rather be judged by 12 than carried by 6.

      Delete